Club Citroen

mi-am schimbat cd-player-ul clarion cu un mp3 pt ca era enervant sa tot fac cd-uri audio sau sa tot schimb cd-urile, mai ales la drum lung, ma enerva sa ascult aceleasi melodii la nesfarsit. am incercat cateva modulatoare dar se aud prost pe clarion-ul original, fiind incercate pe un casetofon de logan, unde merg foarte bine. in cele din urma am hotarat sa schimb cd-player-ul cu un mp3-player, renuntand la comenzile de la volan. toate bune si frumoase, merge bine, am si iesire pentru statie, doar ca a aparut o alta problema. imi ramane blocat afisajul central pe ultima imagine de la pornire sau de la inchiderea usii. imi ramane de cele mai multe ori scris despre vreo usa deschisa, iar ceasul ramane blocat, nu se misca, desi functioneaza. daca opresc si scot cheia si apoi pornesc iar, sare la ora normala, dar in rest ramane blocat. stie cineva vreo solutie pentru rezolvarea problemei i afara de rocada player-elor? astept parerile voastre

scoate bateria masinii 2 min. Si la mine a facut la fel si asta a fost solutia.

problema e ca nici ceasul nu il pot regla. asta am observat ulterior.

Se rezolva si problema cu reglarea ceasului tot cu decuplarea bateriei.

am sa incerc sa vad, mersi mult. revin sa spun ce s-a intamplat.

asa e, ai dreptate, s-a rezolvat problema. doar ca am pus la loc cd-player-ul.originalul e original si nu se compara claritatea unui mp3 cu al unui cd audio.pacat ca nu se aude bine nici un modulator fm pe clarion-ul de pe c3.asta e, incercam un usb-box sau o magazie.mersi de sfat

eu zic sa nu arunci replici chiar asa... In primul rand, orice cd player mp3 citeste cduri audio. Daca cdurile audio se aud mai bine in cel original, inseamna ca ai luat un cdplayer de calitate slaba. Mai mult, cele cu care vin echipate masinile, de obicei, este de calitate medie.

Un mp3 de 320kbps iti da o calitate maxima a sunetului.

http://www.lincomatic.com/mp3/mp3quality.html

Conclusions

All in all, I was impressed by the quality of MP3's vs CD. Unlike the preconceived notions I had when I set out to do these tests, the 192Kbps MP3 was indeed "near CD quality." The degradation was indeed subtle, but noticeable. It is my belief, however, that on the HiFi setup the 192Kbps MP3 is more fatiguing to the ears during extended listening. Surprisingly, 256Kbps and 320Kbps MP3 were virtually indistinguishable by my ears from the CD, except for a light boost in the upper midrange and treble.

So what does this all mean? My feeling is that 192Kbps MP3 is more than adequate for listening with a computer or in a car. The distortion and lousy frequency response of the systems themselves (as well as the high ambient noise in a car) make the 192Kbps MP3 sound so similar to the original CD that the advantage of the smaller storage requirements of the MP3 far outweigh the sonic benefits of the CD. It's nice to have 5-6 audio CD's worth of music on a single MP3 CD - almost like having a CD changer in your hands. On the other hand, for critical listening on a HiFi, I feel that 256Kbps is the best bitrate to use, because it sounds significantly better than 192Kbps. Since I couldn't hear any improvement at all when going to up to 320Kbps, I don't recommend going this high for the simple reason that the file sizes are significantly larger.

MP3's ripped with BladeENC sound far better than I expected, and I believe that most listeners (except neurotic audiophiles those with extremely expensive equipment who claim that $800/meter speaker cables sound significantly better than my cheap but high quality 12 gauge stranded copper cables) would find that the difference in audio quality between the original CD's and 256Kbps MP3 is insignificant.